| Details of Planning Application - 09/1670/F | View on Map |
| Application registered | Consultation period | Awaiting decision | Decided | Appeal | Appeal decided |
|
|---|
| Application type: | Full Planning Permission |
|---|
| Date received: | 25/08/2009 |
|---|
| Registration date: | 25/08/2009 |
|---|
| Consultation start date: | 25/08/2009 |
|---|
| Earliest decision date: | 14/10/2009 |
|---|
| Target date for decision: | 20/10/2009 |
|---|
| Location: | 40 HUMBER ROAD, BLACKHEATH, LONDON, SE3 7LT |
|---|
| Ward name: | BLACKHEATH AND WESTCOMBE |
|---|
| Sub area: | Not available |
|---|
| Conservation area: | WESTCOMBE PARK |
|---|
| Listed building grade: | Not available |
|---|
| Environmental assessment: | Not available |
|---|
| Target recommendation date: | 06/10/2009 |
|---|
| Expected decision level: | Not available |
|---|
| Easting/northing: | 539682/177873 |
|---|
| Statutory class: | Not available |
|---|
| Proposal: | Formation of a loft conversion and installation of two rear dormer windows. |
|---|
| Case officer: | Alex Smith |
|---|
| Case officer tel: | 020 8921 5892 |
|---|
| Case officer email: | alex.smith1@greenwich.gov.uk |
|---|
| Status: | Decided |
|---|
| Agent: | Building Doctors Ltd. |
|---|
| Mr Alex Thompson |
|---|
| 96 Farringdon Road |
|---|
| London |
|---|
| EC1R 3EA |
|---|
| Applicant: | Mrs Shankey |
|---|
| 40 Humber Road |
|---|
| London |
|---|
| SE3 7LT |
|---|
| Press date: | 23/09/2009 |
|---|
| Site notice date: | 23/09/2009 |
|---|
| Neighbours | Responses received: 0 |
|---|
| and representatives: | In favour: 0 |
|---|
| List of neighbours and representatives | Against: 0 |
|---|
| Petitions: 0 |
|---|
| Officer site visit date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee site visit date: | No date |
|---|
| Committee meeting date: | No date |
|---|
| Decision Level: | Delegation |
|---|
| Date decision made: | 15/10/2009 |
|---|
| Date decision despatched: | 16/10/2009 |
|---|
| Decision: | Refuse |
|---|
| Planning obligation: | Not available |
|---|
| Conditions or reasons: | | 1)
The proposed two rear dormer windows by reason of their design, scale, bulk and massing, and prominent siting would constitute an over dominant and visually intrusive feature on the rear roof slope, detracting from the character and appearance of the host building it forms part of, and the character and appearance amenities of the Westcombe Park Conservation Area, contrary to policies SD1, SD3, D1, D9 and D16 of the Unitary Development Plan. |
|
|---|
| Informative notes: | There are no informative notes |
|---|
| Appeal received date: | This case has no appeals against it |
|---|
